Northern Ireland: There is 'space for a solution' says Berger
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Miguel Berger, German Ambassador to the UK, told Andrew Marr on LBC that the EU was faced with “disappointment” over the protocol disagreements because they believed “with the whole Ukraine crisis this was not the moment” for a debate. But, he added, he believed, as did “many European capitals”, that after the summer there would be an opportunity to “sit down and find a solution”. It comes as DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson accused the EU of threatening to remove Northern Ireland’s access to the single market by way of “punishing” British business.
Mr Marr said: “Let me turn to another diplomatic issue: the Northern Ireland protocol.
“You’ve been very clear about what you think about the British Government overriding that and we’ve talked about it a lot on this programme.
“Can I ask you something else? Can I ask you what would happen, from the EU side, if the British Government goes ahead with this? Will there be a trade war?”
Mr Berg said: “I really hope that we can avoid a trade war.
“I can tell you there is a lot of disappointment with this Bill especially because we thought with the whole Ukraine crisis this was not the moment to have this debate.
“I think this is really the feeling in Brussels and many [European] capitals: There is space to find a negotiated solution.
“So, we hope that maybe after the summer break, the Commission and the British Government can sit down and find a solution.”
He added: “We think it is possible”, before Mr Marr said: “Reset and start again.”
DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson said today the European Union is threatening to impose a hard border to “punish” Northern Ireland businesses.
Sir Jeffrey said: “The EU has threatened to remove access for Northern Ireland businesses to their single market, and to police this they would have to create a hard border on the island of Ireland, that’s the only consequence of their actions.
“Does the Secretary of State agree with me that such a threat from the EU indicates that, far from wanting to protect the Good Friday Agreement and peace and stability in Northern Ireland, they simply want to punish Northern Ireland businesses because the UK Government wants to protect the UK internal market?”
Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis replied: “The right honourable gentleman makes an important point, and it is right that we are looking to deliver on all three stands of the Belfast Good Friday Agreement.
DON’T MISS: Remainers’ number one argument for rejoining torn apart [REVEAL]
‘Breaking own law’ EU shoots itself in foot with ‘posturing’ threats [REPORT]
Brexit Britain ‘should ignore EU threats’ over Northern Ireland [INSIGHT]
“We will never be looking at any sort of infrastructure, there cannot be a hard border on the island of Ireland, in the same way that there should not be a hard border between east and west, that’s the issue of three strands.
“We recognise that the EU’s focus is on their single market… we will ensure that their single market is protected, but we will defend all three strands of the Belfast Good Friday Agreement.”
Meanwhile, Brexit opportunities minister Jacob Rees-Mogg played down suggestions that plans to reform retained EU law could lead to further clashes over the post-Brexit trading arrangements for Northern Ireland.
He said: “It is very important the benefits of divergence feed through to Northern Ireland. It can’t just be left out in the cold. So this will fit in with the reforms of the protocol.”
EU blocking movement of medical devices to Northern Ireland
EU wants to impose bizarre new rules on Northern Ireland
Leaver says UK won’t ‘take back control’
Von der Leyen has a masterplan to deal with Liz Truss
Brexit POLL: Do YOU think EU will exist in 20 years’ time?
Source: Read Full Article